by Andrew Cohen
Western
ranchers frequently enjoy vast discounts on public grazing fees. So why
are they so angry about sharing space with America's beloved wild
horses?
Reuters As
Wyoming swelters under the summer heat, as the ash and dust from its
forest fires spread out across the Western states, as a sustained
drought deepens the fissures in its barren expanses of scrub and rock,
the battle over the fate of thousands of its wild horses has just
exploded anew in court. Here is a nasty bit of litigation worth watching
for many different reasons, not the least of which is that may help
more people better understand the magnitude of the economic and
political forces which are currently arrayed against the
federally-protected American mustang.
The short version is a
familiar one. Area ranchers, who never wanted the horses around to begin
with, now want the herds gone completely from a vast "checkerboard"
patch of public and private land in southwestern Wyoming, in and around
Sweetwater County,
near Rock Springs. They allege that the Department of the Interior's
Bureau of Land Management has "utterly failed" to limit the number of
wild horses which roam these million-acre (or two-million acre) ranges.
We have a legal right to declare we want no horses on these land, the
ranchers claim, and it's now time we exercised that right.